Skip to content

Conversation

@mrogowski
Copy link
Contributor

This does not seem very elegant, but works for syntax such as:
shmem.iget(data, data, nbr_r, ((1, -1), local_ncols+2), ((1, 1), local_ncols+2), local_nrows)
as an alternative to:
shmem.iget(data[1, -1:], data[1, 1:2], nbr_r, local_ncols+2, local_ncols+2, local_nrows)

What do you think?

@mrogowski mrogowski requested a review from dalcinl April 14, 2023 11:56
@mrogowski mrogowski self-assigned this Apr 14, 2023
@mrogowski mrogowski force-pushed the mrogowski/stride_start branch from bcda2ec to e5b966d Compare April 14, 2023 11:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants